Peter Križan | |
University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute | |
For Belle Aerogel RICH R&D group | |
Proximity focusing RICH in the forward region
K/p separation at 4 GeV/c | |
qc(p) ~ 308 mrad ( n = 1.05 ) | |
qc(p)– qc(K) ~ 23 mrad | |
dqc(meas.) = s0 ~ 13 mrad | |
With 20mm thick aerogel and 6mm PMT pad size | |
ŕ 6s separation with Npe~10 |
Beam test: Cherenkov angle resolution and number of photons
How to increase the number of photons?
FOCUSING CONFIGURATION
-
low momentum
FOCUSING CONFIGURATION
–
momentum scan
FOCUSING CONFIGURATION - inclined tracks
Defocusing configuration, data
Reported last year: better optical quality for n~1.05 hydrophobic aerogel | |
a new solvent (Di-Methyl-Formamide instead of Methyl-alcohol) | |
precursor (Methyl-silicate-51) from a different supplier | |
-> considerable improvement | |
Aerogel production: multilayer samples
Cut into hexagonal shape from a square block | ||
Machining device: use “water-jet” thanks to hydrophobic nature | ||
Development and testing of photon detectors for 1.5 T
Baseline: large area HPD of the proximity focusing type | |
Backup: MCP-PMT |
Photon detector R&D – backup option: Burle MCP-PMT
Photon detector R&D – Burle MCP-PMT bench tests
Study uniformity of the sensitivity over the surface |
Read-out electronics: ASIC under development
Gain:5 [V/pC] | ||
Shaping time:0.15 [μs] | ||
S/N :8 (@2000[e]) | ||
Readout :pipeline with shift register | ||
Package : 18 channels/chip | ||
Proof of principle shown already last time. | |
More photons: employ radiators with multiple refractive indices. Idea successfully tested in beam tests. | |
Aerogel production: transmission length improved, new cutting methods tested, multiple layer samples. | |
R&D issues: development and testing of a multichannel photon detector for high mag. fields | |
mass production of large aerogel tiles | |
readout electronics |
Total number of readout channels for the full detector amounts to 86k. | ||
Detector characteristics | ||
Leakage current: 10 or 25[nA] | ||
Detector capacitance: 10 or 70 [pF/pixel] | ||
signal: 2000 or 20000 [electron/photon] | ||
Need high density front-end electronics. | ||
Need high gain with very low noise amplifiers. | ||
Deadtimeless readout scheme-> Pipeline. | ||
Develop an ASIC for the front-end electronics | ||
Read-out electronics: ASIC under development
Basic parameters for the ASIC (Rohm CMOS 0.35μm) | ||
Gain:5 [V/pC] | ||
Shaping time:0.15 [μs] | ||
VGA:1-16 | ||
S/N :8 (@2000[e]) | ||
Readout :pipeline with shift register | ||
Package : 18 channels/chip | ||
Control : LVDS | ||
Power consumption : 5 m W/channel | ||
Detailed evaluation is under way. |
VA64TAP: backup read-out electronics
Prototype Test
- 3×3multi-channel
HAPD -
Diode : □5 [mm/ch] | |
Gain : 26000 [electron/photon] | |
Cd : 73 [pF] | |
IL : 14 [nA] (average/ch) | |
Condition: VHV=8[KV], VBIAS=320[V] | |
In agreement with expectations (+ 6-8 mrad) | |
Typically around 13 mrad (for 2cm thick aerogel) | |
Shown as a function of thickness, momentum |
Shown as a function of momentum, thickness |
PID capability on test beam data
From typical values (single photon resolution 13mrad and 6 detected photons) we can estimate the Cherenkov resolution per track: 5.3mrad; | |
-> 4.3sigma p/K separation a 4GeV/c. |
sq is obtained by fitting the q distribution Gaussian + background |
Yield losses at tile boundaries
Scan with the beam across the tile boundary. As expected, the yield is affected over a few mm in the vicinity of the boundary. | |
A simple model (all photons hitting the boundary get lost) accounts for most of the dependence |
92% of the surface covered by HPDs | |
minimal distance between modules: 0.5~mm | |
max. distance (few mm) allows for feeding in the HV supply cable (has to come to the front side of the HPD) | |
six equal sectors |